The reliability layer
for physical AI.
Upload a workflow video. Detect failures. Review incidents.
Build institutional memory.
- ✓object_in_sourcet=0.00s
- ✓object_pickedt=2.84s
- ✓object_in_processt=6.21s
- ↩object_in_sourceREVERSAL — unexpected return to source zonet=9.87s
- —object_in_outputskipped
Your current debugging workflow costs you 30–60 minutes per incident.
ML engineers deploying robot arms in production have Sentry for their Python models, Prometheus for their infrastructure, and nothing for the physical execution layer. When a cycle fails, they watch the video themselves.
No structure. No recall. No pattern detection. When a new engineer joins, the institutional knowledge of past failures lives in Slack and people's heads.
Drop a workflow video
Upload any camera recording of your robot arm cycle. MP4, MOV, or AVI. Up to 500MB.
# POST /api/upload-videofile: workflow_run_47.mp4workflow_id: "pick-place-v2"name: "Run #47 — Line 3" → { "status": "uploaded" }Structured anomaly detection
Rule-based engine checks 6 anomaly types against your workflow template. Results in under 60s.
# GET /api/executions/{id}{ status: "failed", anomalies: [{ type: "reversal", confidence: 0.87, at: 9.87 }]}Human review queue
Every detected anomaly goes into a review queue. Confirm or flag as false positive. One click.
# POST /api/anomalies/{id}/review{ verdict: "confirmed", reviewer: "mleng@co.com", note: "gripper slip"} → { "status": "reviewed" }Incident memory that compounds
Every confirmed incident is stored, searchable, and feeds pattern detection across future runs.
# GET /api/incidents?type=reversal{ total: 14, first_seen: "2025-11-03", pattern: "gripper_pressure", recurrence: "every 3.2d"}